![]() |
| The Old Library of Trinity College, Dublin |
by Maria Popova
Why Tolstoy is 11.6% better than
Shakespeare.
“Reading is the nourishment that
lets you do interesting work,” Jennifer Egan once said. This intersection of
reading and writing is both a necessary bi-directional life skill for us mere
mortals and a secret of iconic writers’ success, as bespoken by their personal
libraries. The Top Ten: Writers Pick Their Favorite Books asks 125 of
modernity’s greatest British and American writers — including Norman Mailer,
Ann Patchett, Jonathan Franzen, Claire Messud, and Joyce Carol Oates — “to
provide a list, ranked, in order, of what [they] consider the ten greatest
works of fiction of all time– novels, story collections, plays, or poems.”
Of the 544 separate titles selected,
each is assigned a reverse-order point value based on the number position at
which it appears on any list — so, a book that tops a list at number one
receives 10 points, and a book that graces the bottom, at number ten, receives
1 point.
In introducing the lists, David Orr
offers a litmus test for greatness:
If you’re putting together a list of
‘the greatest books,’ you’ll want to do two things: (1) out of kindness, avoid
anyone working on a novel; and (2) decide what the word ‘great’ means. The
first part is easy, but how about the second? A short list of possible
definitions of ‘greatness’ might look like this:
1. ‘Great’ means ‘books that have
been greatest for me.’
2. ‘Great’ means ‘books that would
be considered great by the most people over time.’
3. ‘Great’ has nothing to do with
you or me — or people at all. It involves transcendental concepts like God or
the Sublime.
4. ‘Great’? I like Tom Clancy.
From David Foster Wallace (#1: The
Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis) to Stephen King (#1: The Golden Argosy, a 1955
anthology of the best short stories in the English language), the collection
offers a rare glimpse of the building blocks of great creators’ combinatorial
creativity — because, as Austin Kleon put it, “you are a mashup of what you let
into your life.”
The book concludes with an appendix
of “literary number games” summing up some patterns and constructing several
overall rankings based on the totality of the different authors’ picks. Among
them (*with links to free public domain works where available):
TOP TEN WORKS OF THE 20TH CENTURY
Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott
Fitzgerald
In Search of Lost Time by Marcel
Proust
Ulysses* by James Joyce
Dubliners* by James Joyce
One Hundred Years of Solitude by
Gabriel Garcia Marquez
The Sound and the Fury by William
Faulkner
To The Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
The complete stories of Flannery
O’Connor
Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov
TOP TEN WORKS OF THE 19th CENTURY
Anna Karenina* by Leo Tolstoy
Madame Bovary* by Gustave Flaubert
War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
by Mark Twain
The stories of Anton Chekhov
Middlemarch* by George Eliot
Moby-Dick by Herman Melville
Great Expectations* by Charles
Dickens
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor
Dostoevsky
Emma* by Jane Austen
TOP TEN AUTHORS BY NUMBER OF BOOKS
SELECTED
William Shakespeare — 11
William Faulkner — 6
Henry James — 6
Jane Austen — 5
Charles Dickens — 5
Fyodor Dostoevsky — 5
Ernest Hemingway — 5
Franz Kafka — 5
(tie) James Joyce, Thomas Mann,
Vladimir Nabokov, Mark Twain, Virginia Woolf — 4
TOP TEN AUTHORS BY POINTS EARNED
Leo Tolstoy — 327
William Shakespeare — 293
James Joyce — 194
Fyodor Dostoevsky — 177
William Faulkner — 173
Charles Dickens — 168
Anton Chekhov — 165
Gustave Flaubert — 163
Jane Austen
— 161
As a nonfiction loyalist, I’d love a
similar anthology of nonfiction favorites — then again, famous writers might
wave a knowing finger and point me to the complex relationship between truth
and fiction.
[from www.brainpickings.org]









































